Free · 4 minutes · ISO 31000 aligned

Honestly, how good is your risk framework, really?

Most risk frameworks aren't as useful as they look on the page. We've sat across the table from a hundred of them. Run yours through eight honest questions, mapped to the ISO 31000 principles, and find out, in four minutes, what's working, what's not, and where to start.

Why this is different
8 questions
One per ISO principle
~4 minutes
Most finish in three
Free report
If you want it
Example
Prepared for Acme Health Network · Board
67/100
MANAGED
Industry average is 41 / 100. You're in the top third, and the gap above you is the report.
THREE THINGS TO FIX FIRST
  • 01 Inclusive (§4d) Open the register to senior leaders, two clicks.
  • 02 Best information (§4f) Capture the data behind each rating.
  • 03 Continual improvement (§4h) Quarterly retro on the practice, not the risks.
ISO 31000 · §4(a–h) Risk Framework Review
The review

Eight questions. One honest score. Three things to fix first.

Pick the answer that's closest to true. There's no perfect score, and the answers most people give are nothing like the ones they think they're supposed to give.

Why we built this

A risk framework should make decisions faster, not slower.

We've reviewed risk frameworks across ASX-listed boards, primary health networks, NDIS providers, and government. The patterns repeat. So we made the diagnostic we've been doing in workshops into something you can run yourself, before any conversation with us.

01 · HONEST

Built around the principles, not a sales funnel.

Eight questions, one per ISO 31000 principle. You get a real score and a real read, even if you never speak to us.

02 · PRACTICAL

The three things to fix first, with the one-pager to do it.

Knowing your score isn't useful on its own. The report tells you what to do on Monday, not in twelve months.

03 · CONSULTATIVE

A senior advisor reads every result.

No automated CRM nurture. If you book a call, you sit with someone who's done this two hundred times. If you don't, that's fine too.

Client perspective

What it looks like once a framework actually works.

StartRisk didn't give us a document. They gave us a way of thinking about risk that our entire leadership team actually uses.

ExecutivePrimary Health Network · Board-level risk appetite re-set

Finally, a risk framework that doesn't feel like compliance theatre. They understood our culture and built something that actually works for our people.

CEOVision services not-for-profit · Capability review & roadmap

Four minutes now, or twelve months of maybe-we-should-look-at-that.

Most teams put off a framework review because they think it'll be a project. It doesn't have to be. Start with eight honest questions and see where you land.

Just email us instead